I did not go looking for this, but I found it nonetheless. In a lecture before the Student History Association at BYU in 1981, Mormon historian D. Michael Quinn described some of the elements that are, as he puts it, “important to understand his activity as a Mormon historian, his motives, and his reactions to the criticism by his ecclesiastical superiors.” The whole lecture is tightly argued and clearly written.
The excerpt below caught my eye because some of his experience resonates with me. I have not had revelatory experiences such as what he describes. Unlike him, I did not have a family with divided religious sympathies. Rather, quite the opposite. But like him, I had an early familiarity with the existence of my religious heritage (the American Restoration Movement). In fact my awareness of it goes so far back I cannot recall a time when I did not have it. If I had to pinpoint a time when things first clicked, when they first really dawned on me, it would have to be in the fourth grade when I chose to write about Kromer Columbus Ice for a school genealogy project. I think that is when I learned Alexander Campbell was not a member of our family, though his portrait hung on the wall among other long-dead Ice ancestors. I learned why his portrait hung on the wall among other long-dead Ice ancestors. J. W. McGarvey is a name I have known so long I truly cannot remember not knowing it. Like Quinn, I was reading 19th century Restoration books in high school. In my case, by the time Igraduated from high school I read Alexander Campbell’s Christian System (in the Old Paths Book Club edition which bore the title Christianity Restored) and Lectures on the Pentateuch, Conwell’s Life of Garfield, J. W. McGarvey’s Commentary on Acts (1863 and 1892 revised editions), Isaac Errett’s Letters to a Young Christian and Walks About Jerusalem, J. B. Briney’s The Form of Baptism, D. R. Dungan’s Hermeneutics, Leroy Brownlow’s Why I am a Member of the Church of Christ, John D. Cox’s Church History, and every issue I could find of Christian Standard, Word and Work, Christian Woman, and Gospel Advocate.
There was much I did not understand in those books, but I understood enough for it to stick.
That I came across Quinn’s lecture later in the same day after finishing the previous post about Claude Spencer is, I believe, a mere happenstance. Quinn might have interpreted it as a sign. Here’s the excerpt:
In addition to these jaundiced ecclesiastical views of Mormon history writing by Latter-day Saints, Mormon historians have also recently received criticism from fellow academic Louis C. Midgley, political philosopher at Brigham Young University. Midgley concludes a 1981 presentation on Mormon historians with the following statement:
It is depressing to see some historians now struggling to get on the stage to act out the role of the mature, honest historian committed to something called “objective history,” and, at the same time, the role of the faithful Saint. The discordance between those roles has produced more than a little bad faith (that is, self-deception) and even, perhaps, some blatant hypocrisy; it has also produced some pretentious[,] bad history.4
As one of those historians who have struggled to get on the stage Midgley describes, I would like to explore things that he and others have questioned: the motivations, rationale, intentions, and conduct of Latter-day Saints who profess to write objective Mormon history.
I would not claim to speak for anyone aside from the one Mormon historian I know best. His biography is of no interest to anyone but himself, but elements of his background are important to understand his activity as a Mormon historian, his motives, and his reactions to the criticisms by his ecclesiastical superiors. To begin with, he was born with a split-identity: seventh generation Latter-day Saint on his mother’s side, but of Roman Catholic, Mexican origin on his father’s side. Since his earliest childhood, however, self-identity was not the most important emphasis of his life, but rather an intense personal relationship with God. As long as he could remember, he knew God as personage and immediate influence, and on occasion he had heard His voice. Long before he had ever heard much about the Holy Ghost, this young man had what seemed to be constant experience with a presence from God in comfort and revelation “like a fire burning” within him, and as an adolescent he was surprised to discover in scripture descriptions of others’ experiences with the Holy Ghost that he had thought were God’s special gifts to him alone. Although he had always known God as Father, Christ as Savior, and the Holy Ghost as comforter and Revelator, at the age of eleven the young man realized that he had been a member or the LDS Church for three years without specifically asking God about its validity. Therefore, he sought and received knowledge through the Spirit that the Book of Mormon was the word of God, that the Church was true and necessary, and that its president was indeed a prophet of God.
Although his relationship with God and the Spirit was the primary dimension and sufficient epistemology of his life, the young man felt impressed that it was necessary to explore the temporal manifestations of God’s dealings with His people and prophets, as well as their conduct. By age fifteen he had read all the Standard Works (except for half of the Old Testament), and at seventeen he was reading the seven volume History of the Church and Journal of Discourses. To the occasional discomfort of his LDS Seminary teachers, he subjected any religious proposition to analysis, particularly with reference to the complete scriptural context. By eighteen, he had read and made his own card index of the Old Testament and other Standard Works, had written independent studies of misconduct in Roman Catholic popes from Marcellinus to Leo XII and of unfaithfulness in LDS general authorities from Sidney Rigdon to Richard R. Lyman, had compared all proper names in the Book of Mormon with the Bible, and had conducted a line-by-line comparison of the 1830 and later editions of the Book of Mormon. “I will not accept any criticism of the Church on face value,” this eighteen-year-old wrote in his personal journal, “but, instead, search and study (and if need be, pray) to find the truth.”5 During these adolescent years, the young man not only prayed, but often went on food and water fasts of more than three days to draw close to the comfort, strength, and guidance of the Spirit as he confronted the difficulties of maturation at the same time he submerged himself in the intricacies or scriptural study and the diatribes of anti-Mormon literature.
A few months before his nineteenth birthday, the young man wrote:
At present my evaluation of what I am going to have to do to be spiritually educated in the Gospel is to become extremely well acquainted with the Standard Works, Journal of Discourses, Times and Seasons, History of the Church, and the discourses and writings of the Prophets. It is a monumental task at this alone, which requires more than a cursory reading or even a single, very detailed reading of these materials. I can now see clearly, for really the first time, that such a task will take a lifetime to encounter, and longer to master…6
Over the next decade, a series of unforseen circumstances (which he now regards as divine intervention) caused him to abandon his life’s ambition to become a medical physician, and in turn abandon his second-best decision to complete a doctorate in literature. Instead, after much prayer and soul-searching, he decided to turn his intense avocation of scriptural and Church history research into a life’s work. He began graduate study in history, even though he had enrolled in only a couple of undergraduate history courses and had never taken a course in LDS Church history.
Since that time, this junior historian has played a minor role in the development of Mormon history writing since Leonard J. Arrington was appointed Church Historian in 1972. This young historian has spent a decade probing thousands of manuscript diaries and records of Church history that he never dreamed he would see. He has published a score of articles about LDS Church history, several of which have been described as “controversial” by some people. He has always researched and written about Church history with a continual prayer for the Lord to guide him in knowing what to do and how to express things in such a way that they might be beneficial to the understanding of the Latter-day Saints.
The full text of Quinn’s essay is available here.